Let's have a little rant about our lovely female prime
minister here in Australia, Julia
Gillard and her anti-gay stance on same-sex marriage in Australia.
Yes, unfortunately
Gillard does not support the legalisation of gay marriage and she states that
whilst she is in office the policies on same sex marriage will not change.
In fact, it seems to be her personal beliefs that govern rather than it being
what the public want.
On gay marriage, Gillard said: ‘I do find myself on the conservative side in this question’ (of gay
marriage) and she declared there are ‘some
important things from our past that need to continue to be part of our present
and part of our future’ (not gay marriage).
She commented on the Marriage Act and said that, marriage being between
a man and woman – ‘has a special status’.
Insultingly, what
she is implying is that same sex couples should not be able to marry because
she believes such relationships to be inferior to male-female relationships.
What a kick in the face! She is unwilling to allow for laws to be passed to
allow gay people to marry because they just aren’t special enough in her book.
Who gave her the right to judge and decide
what should and shouldn’t be a part of OUR future? This is a democracy.
She is very unprofessional
to let her personal beliefs interfere with her governing so much. As a leader
of a government you would think she would want to keep the public happy and
that she would value their opinion. Especially considering that 60% of Australians
believe same-sex couples should be allowed to marry and 80% of same-sex
partners believe they should have the right to marry.
Gillard
also said it was important for people to understand their Bible stories ‘not because I’m an advocate of religion –
clearly I’m not – but once again, what comes from the Bible has formed such an
important part of our culture.’ Yes
you heard her correctly, she is saying that we shouldn’t allow same-sex
marriage in Australia
because it wasn’t sanctified in the bible.
What a stone age and archaic view she has on the governing of highly developed westernised
country! Well if
it is her personal opinion that, in particular, we should uphold what the bible
has to say on the sanctity of marriage and keep that a part of our future, then
I might like to uphold what the Middle Ages had to say about red heads. Yes that’s right if we delve into the
Middle Ages we would find that red hair was thought to be a sign of beastly
sexual desire and moral degeneration as well as sign of a witch, a werewolf or a vampire. But hey, you
don’t see me going around trying to stake Julia in the heart do you?
You may ask, what reason could Julia Gillard possibly have
for personally opposing same-sex marriages? Well as Labor leader she can claim
to be upholding party policy, even though the ALP in her home state of Victoria has voted
overwhelmingly to end that policy. But as a ‘personal’ stance, her opposition
to gay people marrying is inexplicable. I have tried to figure out why she
would be against it…..
·
She is an atheist, so it can't be
because she believes God ordained marriage as a holy sacrament and condemns
homosexuality as a sin.
·
She has no children, so it can't be
because she believes there's an obligatory link between procreation and the
right to marry.
·
She is in a de facto relationship, so
it can't be because she opposes legally recognising different types of
relationships.
·
She is a female leader, so it can't be
because she believes in some kind of profound biological difference between the
sexes.
·
And as Australian’s first female Prime
Minister, she can't believe that discrimination in the past justifies
discrimination into the future.
For those that argue
that she is working towards ‘equality’ because she has stated that Labor supports civil partnership schemes, I will tell them to look
at US and British studies showing that these schemes do not provide the legal
equality or social recognition that comes with marriage. If they then say: ‘but Labor has supported
financial entitlements for same-sex couples’ then I would reply that we cannot
live on bread alone.
Most of all, we will keep asking why a Prime Minister who
should have every reason to personally support equality, betrays her fellow
citizens by continuing to oppose it.
We must keep fighting for equality, after all it is inevitable.
